Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Schroeder v. Fidelity Investments, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11387
Plaintiff:
Chris Schroeder
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments, Inc., NFS, FBS Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and others
Harris #456411 v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris #456411
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dykes #201541 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes #201541
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder and Unknown Prunick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dykes #201541 v. Becks et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes #201541
Defendant:
Unknown Becks, Unknown Brager and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley-Ellis v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv11121
Petitioner:
Wilshawn Talley-Ellis
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Schroeder v. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv11055
Plaintiff:
Chris Schroeder
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton, County of, Georgia Regional Hospital and others
Platte #285651 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Platte #285651, Jr.
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, M. Dunham, Unknown Sutinen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sango #252200 v. Fleury et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Sango #252200
Defendant:
Timothy Fleury, Michael Eubanks, Unknown Seymorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perron #527537 v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kasey Perron
Defendant:
Warden Sarah Schroeder
Petitioner:
Kasey Perron #527537
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klingenberg et al v. Alcona Community Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv12252
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Klingenberg and B.K.
Defendant:
Alcona Community Schools Board of Education, Dan O'Connor, Chad Spitznagel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
