Cases 1 - 10 of 277
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, ANDREW MCCORMACK, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wedington v. Boncher
as 24-1273
Petitioner:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent:
AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NISBET v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R NISBET and JOSHUA LIBBY
Defendant:
ROB ELLIS, STEVE WEBSTER, CHRIS TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
TODD HOOD
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, LARS OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHAM v. HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Resendes, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA J. ADAMS, BLENDA A. RICE and PATRICIA U. ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN M. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN W. RESENDES, CHRISTOPHER M. PACHECO and SAMUEL RAMUS
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, EDWARD J. DOHERTY, MICHAEL KASPRZAK and others
JORDAN v. KANE
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
MARK R JORDAN
Respondent:
SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Figueroa Garcia v. Zodak
as 1:2023cv11432
Petitioner:
Werner Figueroa Garcia
Respondent:
Scott Zodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
