Cases 41 - 50 of 1,429
SCOTT v. BENEFIEL et al
as 1:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. SCOTT
Defendant:
AARON BENEFIEL, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE, LLC, IND. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MBFMCA, LLC et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
MBFMCA, LLC, MIDWEST BUSINESS FUNDING, INC. and SCOTT CALLAHAN
Defendant:
PAUL C MILLER, BRIAN M LEVINE, JAMES MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
SHOWERS v. FIRST PREMIER BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAYTON SHOWERS
Defendant:
FIRST PREMIER BANK, LISA GERNER, DARRELL E. SCHMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Varner v. Wasmer et al
as 2:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Varner
Defendant:
Todd Wasmer, Oscar Martinez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. R.D.C et al
as 3:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
R.D.C, I.M.P.D, SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANSON v. BOGEL et al
as 1:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
DANNY BRANSON
Defendant:
BOGEL, MARTINI, PLUMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BORGES et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELVIS HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES, RDC RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and SCOTT BLACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Heflin et al
as 3:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Eric A Williams
Defendant:
Tom Heflin, Scott Turney, Shane Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
