Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Ford v. Quorum Health Resources, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Joshua Dufresne, Quorum Health Resources, LLC, Michael Halstead and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Cable Association et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
CTIA - The Wireless Association, USTelecom - The Broadband Association, New England Cable & Telecommunications Association and others
Defendant:
Philip B. Scott, June E. Tierney, Susanne R. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Kokinda v. Koch Industries, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jason Kokinda
Defendant:
Koch Industries, Inc, Phil Scott, Thomas J. Donovan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Papazoni v. Scott
as 2:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Papazoni
Defendant:
Phil Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedell v. Menard et al
as 5:2018cv00046
Petitioner:
Clinton Bedell
Respondent:
Lisa Menard, Phil Scott and T.J. Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cohen et al v. Mt. Mansfield Company Inc.
as 5:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Scott Cohen and Wendy Storch
Defendant:
Mt. Mansfield Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FleetPride, Inc. v. R.R. Charlebois, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
FleetPride, Inc.
Defendant:
R.R. Charlebois, Inc. , Scott Mills and John Terrien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buckner v. Scott et al
as 5:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Sean Buckner
Defendant:
Phil Scott, T.J. Donovan, Matthew Birmingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wakefield v. Scott et al
as 5:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Wakefield
Defendant:
Phil Scott, T.J. Donovan, Matthew Birmingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kokinda v. Koch Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jason Kokinda
Defendant:
Koch Industries, Inc., Burlington Police, Phil Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
