Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dudley v. Consolidated Waste Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Peter Dudley
Defendant:
Consolidated Waste Services, LLC doing business as Twin Bridges Waste and Recycling and Scott Earl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
EARLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14864
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCOTT EARLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl v. Bell House, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Bell House, LLC, Brenda Bailey and Frank Bailey
Plaintiff:
Scott Earl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GUILLORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42741
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EARL GUILLORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRUETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26501
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EARL PRUETT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caballero-Zuniga v. Sarpy County District Court et al
as 4:2020cv03025
Defendant:
Scott Earl, Sarpy County District Court, Stefanie Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel A. Caballero-Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Wolkhamer
as 2:2018mc51057
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott Earl Wolkhamer
In re: Scott Earle
as 15-10232
Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT EARLE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Scott Earle v. Secretary DOC, et al
as 11-11326
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT EARLE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
