Cases 71 - 80 of 115
Maxey v. Johnson, et al
as 2:2015cv01656
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Kevin Johnson, Scott Jones, City of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jones v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2015at00394
Plaintiff:
Walter Olin Jones
Defendant:
County Sacramento, Scott Jones, Tom Andris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroggin v. Cameron et al
as 5:2014cv05380
Plaintiff:
James Michael Scroggin
Defendant:
David Cameron , Randy Atkinson , Dennis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.O.L.T. et al v. Rabe et al
as 2:2014at00849
Plaintiff:
B.O.L.T. , Mark Temple , John Dalke and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rabe , City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kaahu al v. Randall et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jonah K. Kaahu and Donna Liaka Marie Kaahu
Defendant:
Marc A. Randall, Scott Jones Valdez, Andre Phillip Carreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malott v. Placer County et al
as 2:2014cv01040
Plaintiff:
Richard Malott
Defendant:
Placer County , Nevada County , Sacramento County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malott v. Placer County et al
as 2:2014at00509
Plaintiff:
Richard Andrew Malott
Defendant:
Placer County, Nevada County, Sacramento County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Belenky et al v. Kobach et al
as 5:2013cv04150
Plaintiff:
Aaron Belenky , Scott Jones and Equality Kansas
Defendant:
Kris W. Kobach and Brad Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREGOIRE v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2013at01041
Plaintiff:
David W GREGOIRE
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Sheriff's Department, scott jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
