Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Malone v. Russell et al
as 3:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone
Defendant:
Jay Russell, Pat Johnson, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-40792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN ROE, Esquire, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR, AUSA and others
Banks v. Song et al
as 2:2017cv07023
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cesare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 6:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, AUSA Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Holcomb, Sr., et al v. Steve McCraw, et al
as 17-50605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY HOLCOMB, SR., SCOTT SMITH, AMOS JAMES POSTELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROLANDO RIVAS, in his personal capacity, JOHN PELATH, in his personal capacity, ROOSEVELT HATCHER, in his personal capacity and others
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv00579
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
