Cases 11 - 18 of 18
United States of America v. Scott Thompson d/b/a Isosceles LLC
as 5:2015cv05060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott Thompson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Not Yet Classified:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
3Rd Party Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Appellee:
Paul Flecker, Torgan & Cooper, P.C., Daniel Ennis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Crocker Claims Service, Inc. et al v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2013cv02182
Plaintiff:
Crocker Claims Service, Inc. and Scott Thompson
Defendant:
Mary C. O'Connor , Foran, Glennon, Palandech, Ponzi & Rudloff, PC and Christine A. O'Brien
United States of America and State of California Ex Rel. et al v. Kiewit Pacific Company et al
as 3:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of California Ex Rel: Rusty Fryberger , United States of America and State of California Ex Rel: Steve Ruel , United States of America and State of California Ex Rel: Scott Thompson, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Kiewit Pacific Company , Kiewit Infrastructure Group , Ron Rattai and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Rasika Dias, Joan Thompson and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Daniel Ennis and William Greenwood
In Re: City of New York
as 12-687
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Appellant:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Richard Godosky, Attorney and Jose Paguay
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Daniel Ennis, Rasika Dias and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
In Re: City of New York
as 12-831
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Daniel Ennis, Rasika Dias and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Aisha Williams, Osserritta Robinson, Administratrix of the Estate of Louis Alexander Robinson and Osserritta Robinson, Paul Esposito and others
FRUCCI v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2009cv06288
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FRUCCI
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANNE MILGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
