Cases 1 - 10 of 22
George v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tyrone E. George
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Covarty Criminal/District Courts, Tarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tran v. Wisch
as 5:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Vy Bui Tran
Defendant:
Scott Wisch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips v. Cowie
as 22-10767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donnie Earl Phillips, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Ray Cowie, Scott Wisch, Tom Benson and others
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, George Gallagher and Scott Wisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn and Judge Scott Wisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Wisch
as 21-10355
Defendant / Appellee:
Bill Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Judge Scott Wisch, 372 Judicial District Court and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Lee Morris
Morris v. Wisch et al
as 4:2021cv00462
Defendant:
Judge Scott Wisch, Bill Waybourn and Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. McGregor et al
as 4:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Christopher McGregor and Scott Wisch
Plaintiff:
Quartez Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00477
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Norman Agnew, et al v. City of Fort Worth, Texas, et al
as 18-10912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LEE AGNEW
Appellant:
BRIDGETTE A. AGNEW
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY and JUDGE SCOTT WISCH, 372nd District Court Tarrant County Fort Worth, Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
