Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34527
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WYNN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wynn v. Vilsack et al
as 3:2021cv00514
Defendant:
Zach Ducheneaux and Thomas J. Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Scott Wynn
Amicus Curiae:
The National Black Farmers Association and Association of American Indian Farmers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Miller et al v. Vilsack
as 4:2021cv00595
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack and Federation of Southern Cooperatives/Land Assistance Fund
Plaintiff:
Sid Miller, James Meek, Greg Macha and others
Petitioner:
Corey Lea, Lee Perry, Scott Wynn and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Black Farmers Association (NBFA) and Association of American Indian Farmers (AAIF)
Amicus Curiae:
Rural Coalition, Intertribal Agriculture Council, North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers Land Loss Prevention Project and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
WYNNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77343
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WYNNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33171
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patricia A. Boyd vs. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co., et al
as 1:2020cv11152
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Friedmann LLP and Patricia A. Boyd
Defendant:
Scott Wynn Wynn Law Group, A.W. Hastings & Co, LLC, Marvin Windows of Tennessee Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wynn v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 6:2014cv00363
Plaintiff:
W. Scott Wynn
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott Wynne v. Paul Renico
as 09-1148
Petitioner - Appellee:
SCOTT WYNNE
Respondent - Appellant:
PAUL RENICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
