Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00374
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDANIEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47609
Plaintiff:
SEAN MCDANIEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Jason D Brown, Hank Binkowski, Wade Spence and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25416
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry et al v. Lewis et al
as 5:2019cv00714
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry and OKC-Northeast High School Alumni Association
Defendant:
Sean McDaniel, Jessica Sherrill, Paula Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
SEAN MCDANIEL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
