Cases 1 - 10 of 393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nelson v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lavar Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Austin Calvert, Sidney Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Chevalier, Jailyn LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. LeBlanc
as 24-30100
Plaintiff:
Austin Frederick
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Angela Griffin, M. Lewis and others
Gonzales v. Wray
as 24-10122
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Director, FBI, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William Burns, Director, CIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
