Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Hill v. Premier Healthcare Services, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv01956
Plaintiff:
Darrell James Hill
Defendant:
Premier Healthcare Services, LLC, Secretary of the Treasury and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill v. Promise Hospital of Phoenix, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01958
Plaintiff:
Darrell James Hill
Defendant:
Promise Hospital of Phoenix, Inc., Secretary of the Treasury and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shah v. Health and Human Services, Department of, Secretary et al
as 2:2009cv00046
Plaintiff:
Rajumati Kanaiyalal Shah
Defendant:
Health and Human Services, Department of, Secretary, Richard J. Zettel and Renne Destefano
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vergara v. United States et al
as 2:2007cv02634
Petitioner:
Steven Vergara
Respondent:
United States, Secretary of State and Secretary of the United States Treasury
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joseph Oquendo Saladino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rosen v. Leavitt et al
as 2:2007cv01686
Plaintiff:
Michael Rosen
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human Services and Health and Human Services, Department of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Arizona Secretary of State, State of et al
as 2:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
Jomo Williams
Defendant:
Arizona Secretary of State, State of, N.Y.S.D.O.C., Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bravo-Diego v. ICE et al
as 2:2007cv01115
Petitioner:
Juan Bravo-Diego
Respondent:
ICE, INS District Director, DHS Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gundelach v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007mc00022
Petitioner:
Gloria Gundelach
Respondent:
United States of America, Ryan Cvancara, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
