Cases 51 - 60 of 56,347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ALBERTSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00765
Petitioner:
KRISTINE ALBERTSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
PAGE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00774
Petitioner:
RHONA PAGE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DOBBINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00769
Petitioner:
REBECCA DOBBINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RATCLIFFE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00770
Petitioner:
JOANNA RATCLIFFE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Powell v. Mayorkas
as 24-3181
Plaintiff:
PHOEBE POWELL, an individual
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, a government entity
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Mahic v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mahic
Defendant:
State of Florida
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Abney v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11554
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY KYLE ABNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
