Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, The Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Star v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv23941
Plaintiff:
Maryna Star
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Manuel Pomavilla-Pichisaca v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 22-3328
Petitioner:
Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
