Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Rexann Jasso v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02344
Defendant:
Does, Sams West, Inc., Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rexann Jasso
Muni Abubakar et al v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01949
Plaintiff:
Muni Abubakar and Diamond Manuel
Defendant:
Does and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Murillo v. Goad et al
as 2:2017mc00045
Petitioner:
Lino Murillo
Defendant:
Brendan Michael Goad and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Respondent:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
David C. Wynn v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04710
Defendant:
Does, NBCUniversal Media, LLC and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David C Wynn
HTH Trucking Incorporated v. PV Holding Corporation et al
as 2:2017mc00017
Petitioner:
HTH Trucking Incorporated
Respondent:
PV Holding Corporation, Avis Budget Group Incorporated and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Diahann Grasty
Defendant:
William Rock, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., William Blumthal and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
as 2:2012mc00053
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly C. Soukup
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
as 1:2012mc91168
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly C. Soukup
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
as 2:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly Soukup
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
as 3:2012mc80106
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberley Soukup
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
