Cases 1 - 10 of 19
SEELEY II v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv01681
Petitioner:
CLARENCE SEELEY II
Respondent:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Thomas Kia of Highland et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Defendant:
Keith O. Allen, Thomas Kia of Highland, Tom Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SEELEY v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SEELEY
Defendant:
TALBOT, AGNES OPOKU, HANNAH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEELEY v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00219
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DIANE SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SEELEY v. ZATECKY
as 1:2018cv01553
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
CLARENCE SEELEY
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wehmeyer v. Bolka et al
as 2:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Janet Wehmeyer
Defendant:
Derek Bolka, Nancy Seeley, Diane Wyszynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allstate Insurance Company v. Grigsby et al
as 2:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephanie Grigsby , John Grigsby , Jason Grigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEELEY et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
ALYSHA JOAWN SEELEY and DAVID SEELEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
SEELEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 2:2014cv00022
Defendant:
ROBERT W BAESLER, TANYA BELL, CLIFFORD CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SEELEY et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al
as 4:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANGELA ANGLIN, CYNTHIA BOWERS, BRENDA FARMER and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, C. R. BARD, INC. and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
