Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5293
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5295
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv12132
Defendant:
Seema Verma, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, Medicare Advocacy Project and Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Senior Life York, Inc. v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv01737
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II and Seema Verma
Plaintiff:
Senior Life York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROSE, JR. et al v. AZAR, II et al
as 1:2019cv02848
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Demetrios Kouzoukas, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Holbrock, Rhonda Cree, Monte A. Rose Jr. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Rock River Health Care, LLC, et al v. Theresa Eagleson, et al
as 19-2750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC, doing business as APERION CARE INTERNATIONAL, ROCK RIVER HEALTH CARE, LLC and ISLAND CITY REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, doing business as APERION CARE WILMINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SEEMA VERMA, in her official capacity as the Administrator of the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services and THERESA A. EAGLESON
Northport Health Services of Arkansas LLC et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2019cv05168
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
NWA Nursing Center, LLC, Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC, Atkins Care Center, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Justice in Aging and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Merck & Co., Inc., et al v. HHS, et al
as 19-5222
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Seema Verma, in her official capacity as the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Association of National Advertisers, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Eli Lilly and Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP and AARP Foundation
ASANTE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2019cv02512
Defendant:
Secretary ALEX M. AZAR, II, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
ASANTE, YUMA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aurora Chicago Lakeshore Hospital v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05281
Defendant:
Seema Verma, ALEX M AZAR, II and Capt. Anna Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Aurora Chicago Lakeshore Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
