Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United States of America v. Mendez
as 23-3477
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO MENDEZ
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43817
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. USA (2255 - 2:11-cr-0356-KJM)
as 2:2016cv02880
Petitioner:
Sergio Mendez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas et al v. Parking Systems Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06268
Defendant:
Mark Baron, Luis Medrano, Parking Systems Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mendez Martinez and Louis Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendez v. USA (2255-2:11-cr-0356 KJM)
as 2:2016cv01473
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sergio Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Velazquez et al v. Pugsley & LaHaie Landscaping, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01028
Plaintiff:
Ivan Velazquez , Enrique Aguiran Belem , Dorian Arteaga and others
Defendant:
Pugsley & LaHaie Landscaping, LLC , Apex Landscaping, LLC and Robert Atwater
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Muho v. Mendez et al
as 1:2015cv23884
Plaintiff:
Gerti Muho
Defendant:
Sergio Mendez, Norma Lindsey, Mendez & Mendez P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sergio Juarez v. US
as 14-7751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGIO MENDEZ JUAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
JUAREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00821
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MENDEZ JUAREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
