Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Trais Haire v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
TRAIS FERNANDEZ HAIRE
Defendant:
MATTHEW BURNS, sued as Lt Burns, JEREMY STANIEC, Officer, sued as Lt Stanrec, JEREMY WESTRA, sued as Cpt Westra and others
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. YATAGARASU RAMEN INC et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
SETH H THOMAS
Defendant:
YATAGARASU RAMEN INC and QUINCQI NI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Seth Steidinger
Defendant:
Blackstone Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
VILCHUCK v. BALLENGER et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
J. D. BALLENGER, DENNIS REAGLE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. BENEFIEL
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
SETH VILCHUCK
Defendant:
BENEFIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
