Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Cofield et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cofield and Karen A. Cofield
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation, David I. Beem, Tyrone L. Beem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mugrage et al v. Staley et al
as 2:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Brenda Mugrage and Rusty Mugrage
Defendant:
Seth Staley and Oglesby Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Holmes v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Seth Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Deberry v. Jividen et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Reggie Sellers, Andrew Ickler, Jeffery Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Deberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Idleman v. King, et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Idleman
Defendant:
Deputy Mike King, Officer John Doe and Trooper Seth McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hupp et al v. Cook et al
as 2:2017cv00926
Plaintiff:
Tiffanie Hupp , Riley Hupp and Clifford Myers
Defendant:
Seth Cook, C.R. "Jay" Smithers and West Virginia State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211
Evans et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
Gina Evans and Seth Evans
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
