Cases 11 - 20 of 27
DUPLESSIS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04377
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DUPLESSIS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, O. FORD, C/O ANTWI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETTS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALBERT EVERETTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, SGT JOHN DOE "WALTMIRE", JOHN DOE OSHLICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mauder v. Brittain et al
as 1:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
Corrections Officer John Doe, Captain Reese, Jennifer Newberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00819
Defendant:
OFFICER SPICER, OFFICER CESPEDES, COMMISSIONER ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. COUNTY INVESTIGATING OFFICER JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2020cv00613
Respondent:
CORRECTIONAL SGT JOHN DOE #2, GEO GROUP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDWARD WRIGHT, 3RD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARTER, JOHN WETZEL, Lt. JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
BRAKEER NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Clark v. C.O. Covington et al
as 1:2017cv02309
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Clark
Defendant:
C.O. Covington, Sgt. John Doe, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
RODGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH, LT. JANE DOE and SGT. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWRY v. FARLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
SHARRON WILLIAM LOWRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FARLEY, SGT. JOHN DOE, ABINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
