Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Dushan Nickolich, II v. Shanda Payne, et al
as 22-15152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSHAN STEPHAN NICKOLICH II
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANDA PAYNE, Administrative Director, DAVE YOUNG, Health Program Manager III and ALMA MANCILLA
Nickolich v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01702
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Dave Young and Alma Mancilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Robinson
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Dave Young, Shaun Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01431
Plaintiff:
John D Warren
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Dave Young, Ismael Espiricueta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nickolich v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv01112
Defendant:
Dave Young, Alma Mancilla and Shanda Payne
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00937
Defendant:
Alex Eisdorfer, Pascal Koulemou, Amber Butt and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Allen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baron-St. Laurent v. Morrison Health Food Service et al
as 2:2021cv00837
Defendant:
Dave Young, Aaron Bowen, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rene Baron-St. Laurent, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bean v. Arizona Community Protection a, et al
as 20-17078
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDRA COKER, Psychologist II Associate, SHANDA PAYNE, Administrative Director, DAVE YOUNG, Health Program Manager III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BEAN
Defendant:
ARIZONA COMMUNITY PROTECTION AND TREATMENT CENTER
Broadbent v. Bowen et al
as 2:2020cv01765
Defendant:
Aaron Bowen and Shanda Payne
Plaintiff:
Courtney Dee Broadbent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baron-St. Laurent v. Payne et al
as 2:2020cv01659
Defendant:
Kevin Galbreath, Sheridan Miller, Shanda Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rene Baron-St. Laurent, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
