Cases 1 - 10 of 76
SIZELOVE v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2026cv01361
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SIZELOVE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, PAUL TOLBOT, THOMAS MILLIKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton Wright v. Shane Nelson, et al
as 26-2165
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
SHANE NELSON, JOSEPH LEE, VOYLE D. GARD and others
Hillier v. Nelson
as 6:2026cv01040
Plaintiff:
Seth Hillier
Defendant:
Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton Wright v. Shane Nelson, et al
as 26-1945
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
SHANE NELSON, JOSEPH LEE, VOYLE D. GARD and others
Blair v. Nelson
as 6:2026cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Blair
Defendant:
Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Hawkins
as 25-4129
Petitioner:
In re: DALLIN BRAD HAWKINS
Respondent:
THIRD DISTRICT COURT, LINDA JONES, Judge, THOMAS V. LOPRESTO, II and others
GHOLSTON v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2025cv01162
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. GHOLSTON
Defendant:
MELISSA RUTLEDGE, PREA STAFF, OMBUDSMAN DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. Nelson, et al.
as 25-1112
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYLE, an individual
Defendant:
L. SHANE NELSON, in his Individual Capacity and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff for the County of Deschutes, MICHAEL HUDSON, an Individual and in his official capacity, JAYSON JANES, an Individual; an Individual and in his official capacity and others
Boyle v. Nelson, et al.
as 25-1111
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYLE, an individual
Defendant:
L. SHANE NELSON, Deschutes County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL HUDSON, an individual and in his official capacity, JAYSON JANES, an individual and in his official capacity and others
Fernald v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv02155
Defendant:
Shane Nelson, Deschutes County, John / Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Fernald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
