Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kelvin Henry v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 23-6339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN TOYO HENRY, a/k/a Kevin Toyo Banks
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, DETECTIVE SHAWN CUTTING and others
Henry v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 6:2022cv04708
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Toyo Henry
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The, Tameesha Henry, April Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Henry v. Warden of Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 8:2022cv04380
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Toyo Henry
Defendant:
Warden of Greenville County Detention Center, South Carolina, The State of, Detective Shawn Cutting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Henry v. Warden of the Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 6:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Toyo Henry
Defendant:
Warden of the Greenville County Detention Center, Simpsonville Police Department, Officer T Kellett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Guler v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Lake View Trust, Does 1-20, Crypto Traders Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Alper Guler
Guler v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Janine M. Cutting, Lake View Trust, Crypto Traders Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Alper Guler
Schwendeman v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00448
Defendant:
Shawn Cutting, Crypto Traders Management, LLC and Does I-X
Plaintiff:
Chad J Schwendeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell et al v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Merav Knafo and David Powell
Defendant:
Courtney Lata, Shawn Cutting and Crypto Traders Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
