Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FOSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25248
Plaintiff:
SHAWN FOSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FOSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18451
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENSON et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
JAMIE JENSON , AMBER JACKSON , MAGEN ALLEN and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gay v. Foster et al
as 1:2016cv02415
Petitioner:
Terry Gay
Defendant:
Shawn Foster and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Bannerman v. Mountain State Pawn, Inc
as 10-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BANNERMAN, TRICIA BANNERMAN, JESSE BRYAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MOUNTAIN STATE PAWN, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Famous Pawnbrokers/Jewelry & Loan, a West Virginia corporation
Bixler, et al v. Foster, et al
as 10-2099
Counter Defendant:
GEORGANNE BIXLER, BUDDY JACK KENNEMUR, CARROLL SORELLE and others
Plaintiff:
MINERAL ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, (METCO)
Defendant / Appellee:
J. SHAWN FOSTER
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL DUNCAN and SAM SAPPER
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. COMEAU, PAUL FISH, FRED PETE GIBSON, III, in their individual capacities and others
Bannerman et al v. Mountain State Pawn, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Bannerman , Tricia Bannerman , Jesse Bryan and others
Defendant:
Mountain State Pawn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bixler, et al v. Foster, et al
as 09-2138
Counter Defendant:
GEORGANNE BIXLER, BUDDY JACK KENNEMUR, CARROLL SORELLE and others
Plaintiff:
MINERAL ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, (METCO)
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL FISH, FRED PETE GIBSON, III, in their individual capacities, JIM MALONE and others
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL DUNCAN and SAM SAPPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
