Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Christopher Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05043
Plaintiff:
Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner, Hasan Altimimi and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00835
Plaintiff:
Acly, Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner, Hasan Altimimi and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Huffman v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Terry Huffman, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Lee, David Rausch, James Berrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOWER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39992
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRAHAM FLOWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2019cv00385
Defendant:
Jordan Evert Wilson and SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Plaintiff:
Shawn Graham
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Graham v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02183
Defendant:
2K Sports, Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and 2K Games, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shawn Graham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Graham v. RWTW, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv06812
Plaintiff:
Shawn Graham
Defendant:
RWTW, LLC, KITH Retail, LLC, New Era Cap Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 112
Graham v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00037
Petitioner:
Jerry Shawn Graham
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
