Cases 1 - 10 of 11
King v. State Of Louisiana et al
as 3:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Eddie Sandford, Office of Behavioral Health, State Of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zachary King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rimer v. Andrews County Law Enforcement et al
as 7:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Brandi Shultz, Chris Pena, Shawn Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rimer v. Andrews County Law Enforcement et al
as 5:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Brandi Shultz, Andrews Police Department, Chris Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. Turner Industries Group LLC
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Loyd Bowman , All Plaintiffs , Demetrius Joseph Braud and others
Defendant:
Turner Industries Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Christopher Kelly v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-20617
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vinson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00880
Petitioner:
Shawn Kelly Vinson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv03205
Petitioner:
Christopher Shawn Kelly
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv02500
Petitioner:
Christopher Shawn Kelly
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00856
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Christopher Kelly v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20375
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
