Cases 1 - 10 of 55
SARFATI v. YAMINI et al
as 2:2023cv05116
Plaintiff:
DAVID SARFATI
Defendant:
SHAY YAMINI and ROSELYN YAMINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shay v. Commonwealth of Pa Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gerald Shay
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pa Department of Transportation, Joseph Homitz and MATTHEW WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shay v. Wahl et al
as 3:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Eric W. Shay
Respondent:
Mark Wahl and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STURMAN v. HIPR PACSOFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00995
Defendant:
BING-YU HSIEH, VICTORIA CLAIRE CHEN, HIPR PACSOFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STURMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LEVI et al v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv04989
Plaintiff:
SHAY LEVI and DEBBIE LEVI
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. SCI SMITHFIELD
as 1:2021cv01666
Plaintiff:
Juwan Mitchell
Defendant:
SCI Smithfield, A. Low, INMATE Lourd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. SCI SMITHFIELD
as 2:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
JUWAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
SCI SMITHFIELD, A. LOW, INMATE LOURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GORDON v. GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
GMH CAPITAL PARTNERS, GMH SOUTHPOINTE HOLDINGS, LP and SHAY CARELLY
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
