Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Bey v. Poole et al
as 1:2023cv03704
Plaintiff:
Kingstate Bey
Defendant:
Officer Alex Poole, Norcross Police Department, Norcross Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v WARD et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, STAN SHEPHERD, SHAWN EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wong v. Shepherd Spinal Center Inc.
as 1:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Jessica Wong
Defendant:
Shepherd Spinal Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHERD v. SHAVER
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
RODNEY SHEPHERD, RODNEY SHEPARD and RODNEY G SHEPARD
Respondent:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER and MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
