Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Pratcher v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
Warren Pratcher
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nipper v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 2:2017cv02651
Plaintiff:
James Nipper
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frith v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv02652
Plaintiff:
Ricky Frith
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Renner et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Norfleet
Defendant:
Heather Ann Renner, Judy Farris , Houston County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vittetoe v. Blount County et al (PLR2)
as 3:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Lisa Vittetoe
Defendant:
Blount County , Blount County Sheriff's Office , James L Berrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02623
Plaintiff:
Ryan Winston, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Bradfelid and Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trent v. Gillemwater et al
as 2:2017mc00009
Plaintiff:
Walter Leon Trent
Defendant:
Chad Gillemwater, David Benton, Jeff Hilton and others
Trent v. Gillemwater et al
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Walter Leon Trent
Defendant:
Chad Gillemwater, David Benton, Jeff Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canales, Jr. et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv01148
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Canales, Jr. and Joshua Tripp
Defendant:
Paul Thomas, Gibson County Sheriff's Office and Gibson County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maury County et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Smith and Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
