Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Shipman v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Lewis Shipman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHIPMAN et al v. ARCO INDUSTRIAL SALES et al
as 2:2018cv02922
Defendant:
ARCO INDUSTRIAL SALES, SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC and ARCO INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SHIPMAN, ROY SHIPMAN, III and GAIL SHIPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neumann et al v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
as 2:2018cv02721
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ruschhaupt, Katy Faircloth, Addie Elding and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Neumann et al v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
as 1:2018cv00960
Plaintiff:
Emily Neumann , Bailey Hughes , Katy Faircloth and others
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SHIPMAN et al v. AQUATHERM L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv05416
Plaintiff:
GAIL SHIPMAN , ROY SHIPMAN, III and JUSTIN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
AQUATHERM L.P., N.H. YATES AND COMPANY, INC. and LANDSTAR RANGER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHIPMAN v. VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
D'RAYIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN
Defendant:
VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BACON v. LANGFORD et al
as 2:2015cv05146
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BACON
Defendant:
LANGFORD, ASSISTANT WARDEN, PHILIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIPMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv04249
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
