Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CRUZ v. MOORE SMEAL et al
as 2:2016cv05789
Plaintiff:
HECTOR PAUL CRUZ
Defendant:
MS. SHIRLEY R. MOORE SMEAL, DANIEL D. MCINTYRE, SUPV. OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS & INTELLIGENCE, GAUDENZIA, DRC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, DIANE KAGARISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
William J Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman, Diane Kagarise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. MOORE SMEAL et al
as 5:2012cv05912
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BROOKS
Defendant:
SHIRLEY R. MOORE SMEAL, O. GUNNAIKE, DORINAL L. VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jamison v. Varano et al
as 1:2012cv01500
Plaintiff:
Dashaun Jamison
Defendant:
David A. Varano, R Ellett, Robert McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv06995
Petitioner:
AARON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and SHIRLEY R. MOORE SMEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHEARER v. MOORE SMEAL et al
as 2:2011cv05315
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY SHEARER
Respondent:
SHIRLEY R. MOORE SMEAL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henriquez v. Moore Smeal et al
as 1:2011cv01217
Petitioner:
Rey Henriquez
Respondent:
Shirley R Moore Smeal, David Varano, Unit Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sloan v. Murray et al
as 3:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
John Murray, Ian Taggart, H Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
