Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Siler v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Terry Siler
Defendant:
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Bob Woods, Kevin Helash and others
Siler v. Hicks et al
as 1:2021cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Siler
Defendant:
Officer J. Hicks, Officer Kirk, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siler v. Monroe et al
as 7:2020cv05794
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Monroe, Superintendent Leroy Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Siler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siler v. Fletcher et al
as 9:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Fletcher, Russell and Hollenback
Plaintiff:
Michael Siler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siguencia et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12044
Plaintiff:
Mark Slatnick, Jaime Sosa, Derek Stroke and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Diaz et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv06572
Defendant:
OFFICER AKERI CAMMOCK, DEPUTY WARDEN BARBARA GRIFFITHS, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Velez, Saby Diaz and Julio Lebron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cardenas et al v. A.J. Piedimonte Agricultural Development, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00881
Plaintiff:
Shonda Tate, Jose F Cardenas, Isaiah Alexander and others
Defendant:
Scott James Bennett, MAGC, INC., James J. Piedimonte & Sons, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Siler v. Lamanna et al
as 1:2017cv05996
Petitioner:
Reginald Siler
Respondent:
Lamanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Siler v. Wong
as 1:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Siler
Defendant:
Angus C. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Abram et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Nina Abram , Ruben Rodriguez , kimberly smith and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
