Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Simmons v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Simmons
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Simmons #321572 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01620
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lavelle Simmons
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Swayne, Unknown Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa v. Simmons et al
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Caraffa
Defendant:
Sara Simmons, Ceph Medical Services, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simmons v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08207
Plaintiff:
Dale B Simmons
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08208
Plaintiff:
Steven E Simmons
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Rick Wayne Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Serta Simmons Bedding LLC
as 2:2021cv01115
Defendant:
Serta Simmons Bedding LLC
Plaintiff:
Mason Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farvela v. Abraham et al
as 2:2020cv02484
Defendant:
J Guilin, Harold Wickham, M Frink and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Farvela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons #321572 v. Hensley et al
as 2:2020cv02357
Defendant:
Walter Hensley, Travis Scott, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lavelle Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hasbrouck et al v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08112
Defendant:
David Williams, Carlton Woodruff, Larry Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Donna M Hasbrouck and Earl M Hasbrouck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
