Cases 21 - 30 of 137
Simms v. Cuzio et al
as 3:2021cv00492
Defendant:
Rivera, III, Tardif, Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Gjuraj
as 21-358
Defendant:
Mike Peters, Dondon Fletcher, AKA Yellow, David Karp and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Isni Gjuraj
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01083
Defendant:
CO Graves, CO Rodriguez, Captain Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Lilley
as 1:2021cv00702
Petitioner:
Keith Simms
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biton v. City of New York
as 21-23
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant Ian Nadel, 66th Precinct, in his individual and official capacities, Latisha Wright, 66th Precinct, in her individual and official capacities and City of New York
Defendant:
Police Officers John/Jane Does 1-10, Avaril, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities and Lieutenant Simms, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Iris Biton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simms v. Durant et al
as 3:2020cv01719
Defendant:
Maranda, Durant, Grady and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simms v. Barr
as 20-3321
Petitioner:
Owen Oliver Simms
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
