Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NESBITT v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
SIR NIKOLAAS Q. NESBITT
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RICHARD LAUISH, K. WHEAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Estate Plaintiff:
Erica Newton and Erica L Newton
Defendant:
Daivd Gladieux, Chief Deputy David Butler, Board of Commissioners of the County of Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES v. I.D.O.C. MEDICAL et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
ZECHARIAH B. JAMES
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. MEDICAL, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF DEPARTMENT, MEDICAL COMPANY P.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leato et al v. Sir Oak Crossing, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Steadfast Management Company, Inc., Philadelphia Companies, Sir Oak Crossing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John M Leato and Laurina T Leato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pavey v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00772
Petitioner:
Sir Christopher R Pavey
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASCO CORPORATION OF INDIANA v. SIR FAUCET, LLC
as 1:2011cv00404
Plaintiff:
MASCO CORPORATION OF INDIANA
Defendant:
SIR FAUCET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ZEMPRELLI v. TAUREL et al
as 1:2008cv00854
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZEMPRELLI and EDWARD ZEMPRELLI
Defendant:
SIDNEY TAUREL, JOHN C. LECHLEITER, SIMON N.R. HARFORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAMBRECHT et al v. TAUREL et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
N.A. LAMBRECHT, N.A. LAMBRECHT, N.A. LAMBRECHT and others
Defendant:
SIDNEY TAUREL, JOHN C. LECHLEITER, SIR WINFRIED BISCHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Brown v. USA
as 3:2008cv00018
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Sir A Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
