Cases 41 - 50 of 1,019
Thomas Powers v. Sharlene Caraway, et al
as 19-2490
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, TAMMY TEEL, PAULA LODGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Johnson v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2019cv04125
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, David Biermann, Mickey Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Caraway et al
as 4:2019cv04117
Defendant:
Louie Sisto, Tammy Teel, Cassandra Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. City of National City et al
as 3:2019cv00534
Defendant:
De La Torre, Frantz, Dennis J Leach and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Davis, Marquieta R McNeil and Taneka McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Abreu v. Travers
as 19-564
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Lira, Superintendent for Programs, Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner, Rabideau, Nurse Administrator 2 and others
Defendant:
R. Isobella, Lt., White, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, Garland, C.O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Sistos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons DHO
as 1:2018cv08116
Petitioner:
Rex Sistos
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons DHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Bonilla v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv04247
Defendant:
Brian Hill, S. Sisto, Raimundo Mates de Oca and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terra Naomi Englebardt v. Vito Tumbarello et al
as 2:2018cv05016
Defendant:
Brooklyn Fire Records, Does, Justin Sales Koilparampil and others
Plaintiff:
Terra Naomi Englebardt
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 18-71431
:
In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Charles Reece v. D. Sisto, et al
as 18-15517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGORY REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden and DON MIMIS, Plant Opreation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
