Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Slaughter v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Gary Slaughter
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson, James William S. Jones, Arthur Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaughter v. Americas Home Place
as 1:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
John L Slaughter, Jr
Defendant:
Americas Home Place
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Parmley v. Madison City of et al
as 5:2019cv00568
Defendant:
Robert Brousard, Theresa Duncan, Andrew Slaughter and others
Plaintiff:
William Jason Parmley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slaughter et al v. Moss et al
as 2:2018cv02124
Defendant:
Fast-Tek Express LLC and John Moss
Plaintiff:
Plunta Slaughter and Danyal Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Slaughter
as 2:2018mc03830
Defendant:
Jonathan Slaughter
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order Requiring Examination of Judgment Debtor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Freeman et al v. NIBCO INC
as 5:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jason Freeman , Shana Freeman , Joe Garcia and others
Defendant:
NIBCO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
