Cases 1 - 10 of 1,619
Smith v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Superintendent Clay Corbin, Captain H. Custer, A. Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Micah Smith
Defendant:
Director Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Major Jeremy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Loudoun County School Board et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Tonya Smith
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board and Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Servonte Rhamone Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
