Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Anaya v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Martin Anaya
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. Bennett, . Smythe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smyth v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smyth
Defendant:
Kristen Daniels, O'Shea and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Herrera v. Altizer et al
as 3:2023cv50237
Plaintiff:
Humberto Herrera
Defendant:
Altizer, Ninks, Smiddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Grimes v. Roy Cheatam, et al
as 22-2128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY CHEATAM, WARDEN CIOLLI, UNIT TEAM MANAGER KNIKS and others
Shaw v. Venard et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Shaw
Defendant:
Venard, Gaston, Grunwalnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMYTH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. SMYTH
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Rivers et al
as 3:2021cv50474
Plaintiff:
Jeffery J. Grimes
Defendant:
Warden Rivers, Warden Ciolli, Kniks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohammed v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Legal Services Corporation, Prairie State Legal Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
