Cases 1 - 10 of 19
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Concrete Services of Northwest Arkansas, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05029
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Concrete Services of Northwest Arkansas, Inc., Rex E. McLeod, Jr. and Catherine M. Shelly Smyth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Grace Label Co., Inc. v. Smyth Companies, LLC
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Grace Label Co. Inc and Grace Label Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Smyth Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smythe v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04554
Plaintiff:
Dolores Smythe
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smyth v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
John Smyth
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LLC, Janssen Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smythe v. USA
as 4:2016cv00701
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Smythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Smythe v. United State
as 16-2018
Petitioner:
Michael Smythe
Respondent:
United States of America
White v. Smyth et al
as 4:2016cv00292
Petitioner:
Larry A White
Respondent:
Kelly Smyth and Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 8:2015cv00385
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Ann Kinder, PJ Morgan Real Estate and others
Plaintiff:
Michel Patrick Payne
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461 Homeowners Loan Act
Smythe v. USA
as 4:2013cv00642
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Michael Smythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smythe v. Raycom Media, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smythe
Defendant:
Raycom Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
