Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACK v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv04386
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACK
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY and OFFICER SMYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desher et al v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rylee Smyth and Andrew Desher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
GOODLEY v. NICKOLSON et al
as 2:2020cv00859
Defendant:
DENICE SMYTH, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, B. POKOL and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL GOODLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAYTON v. SMYTH et al
as 2:2020cv00519
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. DENISE SMYTH, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01196
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
