Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Martinez v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Solange Martinez
Defendant:
Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
Oyarzun v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Luisa Oyarzun
Defendant:
Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
United States of America v. Sokol
as 23-6428
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SOKOL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Finger v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07454
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Christine D. Baker, David Carberry and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hill et al v. Norlite, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00439
Defendant:
Tradebe Environmental Services, LLC, Norlite, LLC and Tradebe Treatment and Recycling Northeast, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ed Sokol, Audrey Anna Gallardo, Chelsea Sturtevant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Amparo v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2021cv02672
Defendant:
Correction Officers John Does 1-5, Police Officer Frank Califano, Police Officer Timothy McMenamin and others
Plaintiff:
Max Amparo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Amparo v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2021cv02671
Defendant:
Police Officer William Quirk, Police Officer Frank Califano, Police Officer Timothy McMenamin and others
Plaintiff:
Max Amparo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Moranchal Sarmiento et al v. Eastside Barking Dog Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03190
Defendant:
Ergys Janku, Sokol Kasim, Emin Alliu and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Moranchal Sarmiento
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
