Cases 1 - 10 of 386
SOSA v. CORA et al
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
JUAN SOSA
Defendant:
MARK CORA, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATOR, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salcedo-Sosa (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Miguel Salcedo-Sosa and Miguel Angel Salcedo
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOSA v. WOOLSON et al
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
JUAN SOSA
Defendant:
SERGEANT WOOLSON and S.S.C.F. ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nnamdi v. Salazar
as 24-50020
Plaintiff:
Martin C. Nnamdi
Defendant:
Phillip Jaimes, SAPD Officer, Badge #0302, Javier Salazar, Bexar County Sheriff and Angelica Sosa, Pretrial Bond Officer III, Bexar County Pretrial Services
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Thomas C Sosa, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ
as 5:2023cv01541
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 5:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
FNU Morgan, J.C. Walker, FNU Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Morgan, J.C. Walker, Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott v. Kilgore Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Abbott
Defendant:
Kilgore Police Department, Unknown Sosa and Zach Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
