Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula
as 15-7329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution, LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS, MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care Provider RN and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAJOR JAMES DEAN, LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS and others
Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula
as 15-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Intitution, LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS, MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care Provider RN and others
Defendant:
MAJOR JAMES DEAN, LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS, SERGEANT B. COOK and others
Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula
as 13-7897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Intitution, MAJOR JAMES DEAN, LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01872
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lamar Roberson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Anthony J Padula, James Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
National Trust Insurance Company v. Powell et al
as 3:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
National Trust Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Powell, Paul Robert Smith, South Carolina State Budget and Control Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SC Dept Disabilities v. Hoover Universal Inc
as 07-1190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, and Control Board Insurance Reserve Fund
Defendant - Appellant:
HOOVER UNIVERSAL, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
