Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Jorge Garcia
as 23-4543
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE LUIS GARCIA, a/k/a Spanky
USA v. Angel Rodriguez
as 23-1015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a SPANKY
USA v. Anthony Holmes
as 22-50003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY DANTAE HOLMES, AKA Spanky
USA v. Henry Mendoza
as 19-50092
Defendant / Appellant:
HENRY MENDOZA, AKA Hank, AKA Pelon, AKA Spanks, AKA Spanky
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Spanky's, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00104
Defendant:
Barry Beamish, Janice Beamish and Spanky's, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553
USA v. Martin Carrillo-Castaneda
as 13-50522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN CARRILLO-CASTANEDA, AKA Martin Carillo, AKA Marty Carrillo, AKA Spanky, AKA Rodolfo Valdez
United States of America v. Padilla (Rodriguez)
as 11-5443
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank and Jaime Rodriguez, AKA Jay
United States of America v. Padilla (Camacho)
as 11-5448
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank
USA v. Ernest Patton
as 11-14803
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST PATTON, a.k.a. Spanky
USA v. Martin Carrillo-Castaneda
as 10-50294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN CARRILLO-CASTANEDA, AKA Spanky, AKA Marty Carrillo, AKA Rodolfo Valdez, AKA Martin Carillo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
