Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SPICER v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00582
Petitioner: HARRY SPICER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spicer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00116
Plaintiff: Laura J. Spicer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPICER v. GEO GROUP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02760
Plaintiff: JAMES SPICER
Defendant: NDLAYE, SCUDDER, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPICER v. WARDEN
as 3:2020cv00084
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: MICHAEL SPICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPICER v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 4:2019cv00265
Defendant: CHYEANE JARRET, SHIELA HARRISON and JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Plaintiff: JASON THOMAS SPICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPICER v. WARDEN
as 3:2019cv00212
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: MICHAEL SPICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPICER v. BROWN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00310
Petitioner: SAM SPICER, II
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPICER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01365
Plaintiff: SUZANNE M SPICER and SUZANNE M. SPICER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spicer v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00579
Petitioner: Michael Brandon Spicer
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUCAS v. SPICER et al
as 4:2017cv00029
Defendant: AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA and DONALD SPICER
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?