Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garner v. City of Ozark, et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Spring Garner
Defendant:
City of Ozark and Phil Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co Inc v. Bowman Company, The et al
as 2:2012cv02079
Plaintiff:
Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co Inc
Defendant:
Bowman Company, The , Kenneth Bowman, Jr , Nell Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jamison v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Jamison, Sr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Anthony (Supervisor) and Union Springs Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaneyfelt v. REC I Blue Springs Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Lori Jane Shaneyfelt
Defendant:
REC I Blue Springs Partnership, J P Properties Inc and Susan Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaneyfelt v. REC I/ Blue Springs Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2011cv04366
Plaintiff:
Lori Jane Shaneyfelt
Defendant:
REC I/ Blue Springs Limited Partnership, J.P. Properties, Inc. and Susan Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
