Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv02308
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
AMISUB (SFH), Inc. d/b/a Saint Francis Hospital and AMISUB (SFH),INC. doing business as St Francis Hospital Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cliffrie Morgan v. Saint Francis Hosp
as 21-5037
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFFRIE MORGAN
Thomas v. AMISUB SFH, INC.
as 2:2020cv02040
Defendant:
AMISUB SFH, INC. d/b/a St. Francis Hospital
Plaintiff:
Sasha Thomas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cliffrie Morgan v. St. Francis Hospital
as 19-5162
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFFRIE MORGAN
Bon Secours Health System, Inc. et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45821
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
St. Francis Physician Services, Inc., Bon Secours - St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Inc., Bon Secours Health System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petros v. St. Francis Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00175
Defendant:
St. Francis Hospital and Ralph B. Blasier
Plaintiff:
Harry Steve Petros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
